![]() You can also compare DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for autism on the APA's Web site.) (For a closer look at the changes, read the companion piece: " Autism Is Not a Math Problem". In contrast, the DSM-5 divides seven symptoms of ASD into two main groups: deficits in social communication and social interaction and restricted, repetitive behaviors and interests. The idea is that these conditions have such similar symptoms that they do not belong in separate categories, but instead fall on the same continuum.Įssentially, to qualify for a diagnosis of autistic disorder in DSM-IV, a patient must show at least six of 12 symptoms, which are divided into three groups: deficits in social interaction deficits in communication and repetitive and restricted behaviors and interests. ![]() The DSM-5 subsumes autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS)-which are all distinct disorders in DSM-IV-into one category called autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The major features of autism are impaired social interaction and communication-such as delayed language development, avoiding eye-contact and difficulty making friends-as well as restricted and repetitive behavior, such as repeatedly making the same sound or intense fascination with a particular toy. The studies also point out, however, that minor tweaks to the DSM-5 criteria would make a big difference, bringing autistic people with milder symptoms or sets of symptoms that differ from classic autism back into the spectrumĪutism is a disorder in which a child's brain does not develop typically, and neurons form connections in unusual ways. But in its efforts to make diagnosis more accurate, the APA may have raised the bar for autism a little too high, neglecting autistic people whose symptoms are not as severe as others. Together, the studies conclude that the major changes to the definition of autism in the DSM-5 are well grounded in research and that the new criteria are more accurate than the current DSM-IV criteria. But several studies recently published in child psychiatry journals suggest that it will be more difficult for new generations of high-functioning autistic people to receive a diagnosis because the DSM-5 criteria are too strict. When the APA publishes the DSM-5, people who have already met the criteria for autism in the current DSM-IV will not suddenly lose their current diagnosis as some parents have feared, nor will they lose state services. The devilish confusion is in the details. Psychiatrists and parents have voiced concerns that the new definition of autism in the DSM-5 will exclude many people from both a diagnosis and state services that depend on a diagnosis. The newest edition of the manual, the DSM-5, is slated for publication in May 2013. The controversy remains front and center because the American Psychiatric Association (APA) has almost finished redefining autism, along with all other mental disorders, in an overhaul of a hefty tome dubbed the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ( DSM)-the essential reference guide that clinicians use when evaluating their patients. In many cases, the type and number of symptoms clinicians look for when diagnosing autism determines how easy or difficult it is for autistic people to access medical, social and educational services. ![]() Now, psychiatrists and members of the autistic community are embroiled in a more legitimate kerfuffle that centers on the definition of autism and how clinicians diagnose the disorder. ![]() The controversial idea that childhood vaccines trigger autism also persists, despite the fact that study after study has failed to find any evidence of such a link. People have been arguing about autism for a long time-about what causes it, how to treat it and whether it qualifies as a mental disorder. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |